On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves<[email protected]> wrote: > where is the source for this allegation? In the definition of Open Source > given > in the link above, they make 10 points and none of them 'making entry easier > for business'. You may not like Open Source or may disagree with it's goals, > but you cannot mislabel it as you are doing. This is the definition: > > http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd >
No, you're misunderstanding my point. It does not make entry easier for business. It does two things: 1) Put things in a "business friendly" language. It's like making meat flavoured spinach to please the dog. 2) Includes licenses that do not preserve the freedom of the developer -- Siddhesh Poyarekar http://siddhesh.in -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
