On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Raj Mathur<[email protected]> wrote: > those ends. In all the years I've spent interacting with the OSI, I've > yet to see an example of someone from OSI advocating proprietary > software.
They do not advocate proprietary software. They have without doubt advocated open source software. They just believe that they can coexist. > As for licences, the list of licences considered free by the FSF > (http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/) and the list of licences > considered open source by the OSI > (http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) are more or less the same, > so please don't mix up licensing issues into this discussion. Ok, I stand corrected on the BSD license bit. -- Siddhesh Poyarekar http://siddhesh.in -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
