On Monday 22 June 2009 09:29:40 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves<[email protected]> wrote: > > where is the source for this allegation? In the definition of Open Source > > given in the link above, they make 10 points and none of them 'making > > entry easier for business'. You may not like Open Source or may disagree > > with it's goals, but you cannot mislabel it as you are doing. This is the > > definition: > > > > http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd > > No, you're misunderstanding my point. It does not make entry easier > for business. It does two things:
I have understood your point - you want to spread FUD > > 1) Put things in a "business friendly" language. It's like making meat > flavoured spinach to please the dog. > 2) Includes licenses that do not preserve the freedom of the developer more FUD -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate NRC-FOSS http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
