On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Rony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 05 January 2011 03:27 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: >> >> >>> This >>> is not to say that the other people copying/forking /never/ submit >>> back -- it >>> does happen -- with GPL tho' making it a legal obligation ensures that >>> it always >>> happens. >> not necessarily - a lot of people just do not touch GPL code - they >> prefer to contribute code to projects with a more free license. > > For the sake of those who have been following this long thread and > trying to make some sense out of it, could we have an objective list of > Licenses from all participants with their pros and cons listed. If GPL > restricts freedom then in what way? If BSD restricts freedom then in > what way? Short and simple please. > > If experts on this list cannot agree on what license is good for > software,
See, License of application depends on purpose of application ! most of the time when I just make a very small script or some trick - I use MIT license. If size goes bigger, I use GPL. for libraries - LGPL or varient fits good. for applications GPL is good and also depends on How you want to commercialize... -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
