On Thursday 06 January 2011 09:03 PM, Shamit Verma wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Rony<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thursday 06 January 2011 07:13 PM, Shamit Verma wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Rony<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> So it boils down to the fact that if a browser is willing to give up its >>>> identity and let the individual hardware makers use its code but add >>>> their own label to it then it will be more popular. >>>> >>>> >>> Don't get that... You are referring to WebKit or Opera? >>> >>> >> WebKit. It lost its identity but gained popularity. >> >> > Don't agree with that. Two reasons : > > 1. WebKit is Open Source (LGPG and BSD). That is primary reason for adoption > by everyone. > 2. WebKit is clearly identified in User Agent strings (E.g. > Nokia6303classic/2.0 (06.21) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 > Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+) >
Generally the browser is called 'browser' or 'web' in the phones. Only Opera is called Opera with the 'O' icon. -- As a proper list etiquette... Please trim your replies. Post your replies below the relevant original text, leaving a line space. Do not re-use old messages to write new ones. Regards, Rony. -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
