On Friday 25 November 2011 23:01:00 Rony wrote: > On 11/25/2011 11:02 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > On Friday 25 November 2011 22:32:29 Rony wrote: > >> Every system > >> has its risks and chances of cheating but we have to select the one that > >> has the minimum chances of it and benefits are maximum. Electronic > >> meters can be tampered with but they are still welcome. Wireless > >> communication can be compromised but we cannot do without it. > > > > EXACTLY. This one is the opposite of what you say after spending 150000 > > Cr. You read that right 15 with 4 zeros. And twists the entire concept > > of a democratic system. The UK scrapped an exact same system as the risks > > were too high and benefits non existent. > > No one is denying the need for proper planning and trial runs before > actually implementing the system.
LOL. IF they did that the system would not stand a hope in hell. Luckily public money is like pubic money. -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
