On Friday 25 November 2011 22:32:29 Rony wrote: > On 11/25/2011 12:16 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > The amounts of money in petty corruption on the last mile, is dwarfed by > > several orders of magnitude by corruption higher up the disbursement > > chain. This happens because the power heirachy is set to keep control at > > the top, with a miniscule minority and is the root cause of corruption. > > ID schemes like the UID reinforce this structure and add additional > > dangerous elements for tracking and collecting infomation illicitly. The > > Mumbai police have been involved in illegal surveillance and extortion. > > Such tactics were (and are) used during the emergency to target political > > opponents. > > Every system > has its risks and chances of cheating but we have to select the one that > has the minimum chances of it and benefits are maximum. Electronic > meters can be tampered with but they are still welcome. Wireless > communication can be compromised but we cannot do without it.
EXACTLY. This one is the opposite of what you say after spending 150000 Cr. You read that right 15 with 4 zeros. And twists the entire concept of a democratic system. The UK scrapped an exact same system as the risks were too high and benefits non existent. -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
