On Monday 28 November 2011 21:39:30 Rony wrote: > On 11/27/2011 12:42 PM, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote: > > On 27 November 2011 12:25, Rony <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> history of say, a 100 tribals whom no one has seen before, to detect > >>> the one or two illegals among them? > >> > >> Certain allowances will always have to be given for those below poverty > >> line who are cut off from civilisation. > > > > So you will issue Aadhars to all of them? You now have violated the > > fundamental assumption on the basis of which the conjob called Aadhar > > has been sold to the public - that it will be issued only to those who > > qualify and deserve it. > > No 2 persons will have the same bio-id so it should not matter.
False. This lie was spouted by Mr. NN. There are huge number of false positives in any 1 to many search. These are whittled down by additional parameters until you come to a small number which can be verified manually. There are huge numbers of misses. You will never know about them. In the case of auth, failure to auth - a false negative - means that you are not in the db. So you can obtain a new id. Biometrics is a statistical probability with error rates in excess of .0025% in lab conditions. In reality it is more like 10% in urban middle class situations with regular re-registration and 50% without re registraion over period of 2 years. No study of longer periods. No study of non ideal conditions. No study of large populations. > Even if > they give false names, they will have to stick to it for the rest of > their official lives. READ, READ, READ. But not he UIDAI website, or any thing from it's supporters and employees. All you get is lies. > Who qualifies for and deserves Aadhar? -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
