On Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:33:41 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:

> Use scoped for-each loop when iterating over device nodes to make code a
> bit simpler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> 
> ---

A suggestion inline, but assuming you don't go with that, this is fine.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>

> 
> Depends on the first patch.
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 2e8099479ffa..18695076c34e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -47,9 +47,7 @@ unsigned int exynos_rev(void)
>  
>  void __init exynos_sysram_init(void)
>  {
> -     struct device_node *node;
> -
> -     for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-sysram") {
> +     for_each_compatible_node_scoped(node, NULL, 
> "samsung,exynos4210-sysram") {
>               struct resource res;
>               if (!of_device_is_available(node))
>                       continue;
No idea how common this pattern is, but maybe worth
        for_each_compatible_available_node_scoped() ?
Bit of a pain as you'd need a of_find_compatible_available_node() helper.
So I'll let you assess if there are enough instances of this to make it 
worthwhile.


> @@ -57,15 +55,13 @@ void __init exynos_sysram_init(void)
>               of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
>               sysram_base_addr = ioremap(res.start, resource_size(&res));
>               sysram_base_phys = res.start;
> -             of_node_put(node);
>               break;
>       }
>  
> -     for_each_compatible_node(node, NULL, "samsung,exynos4210-sysram-ns") {
> +     for_each_compatible_node_scoped(node, NULL, 
> "samsung,exynos4210-sysram-ns") {
>               if (!of_device_is_available(node))
>                       continue;
>               sysram_ns_base_addr = of_iomap(node, 0);
> -             of_node_put(node);
>               break;
>       }
>  }
> 


Reply via email to