On Wed 2026-06-24 13:34:19, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:34:58 +0000 Bradley Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Some callers handle SYS_INFO_ALL_BT themselves before calling sys_info(). > > Add a helper that strips that bit without turning an all_bt only mask into > > a kernel_sys_info fallback. > > I assume this patch wants a Fixes: and a cc:stable also. > > It would be nice to have the conventional [0/N] cover letter to tell > readers what this is all about. > > The patches all have different Fixes: targets. This risks inviting the > -stable maintainers to merge only some of the patches into some > kernels, resulting in an untested combination and which might break > things.
I do not agree here. The Fixes tag should should point to a commit which introduced the regression into the given code. And finding some magic common point beause there is some magic undocumented process for maintaining stable kernels sounds like a way to hell to me. Best Regards, Petr
