On 11/08/2026 09:33, Shengjiu Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> Why mentioning upstream in the first place? Either this change breaks >>>> ABI or not, explain that. >>> >>> The deprecated 'port' property is retained, so this change is fully >>> backwards >>> compatible and does not break ABI. >> >> So why? Drop redundant parts. > > Ok, I will remove the sentence below in the commit message. > > No existing upstream DTS file for fsl,imx-asrc uses the previously > documented single 'port' node, so this change does not break any > in-tree device tree. >
Honestly, it's redundant, because you are not dropping it. So even if DTS was using the port, what would change? Best regards, Krzysztof
