On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 3:36 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/08/2026 09:33, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Why mentioning upstream in the first place? Either this change breaks > >>>> ABI or not, explain that. > >>> > >>> The deprecated 'port' property is retained, so this change is fully > >>> backwards > >>> compatible and does not break ABI. > >> > >> So why? Drop redundant parts. > > > > Ok, I will remove the sentence below in the commit message. > > > > No existing upstream DTS file for fsl,imx-asrc uses the previously > > documented single 'port' node, so this change does not break any > > in-tree device tree. > > > > Honestly, it's redundant, because you are not dropping it. So even if > DTS was using the port, what would change? >
Understood. Even if a DTS was using 'port', nothing would change since 'port' is retained. I will drop the sentence in v4. Thanks. Best regards Shengjiu Wang
