+asm ("\n\
A file scope asm?! Please don't.
So what's your proposal then? Placing it within a fake func?
That asm snippet is the entry point. I took as an example how
prpmc2800.c deals with that, providing an own version of the (weak)
_zImage_start.
Use an assembler source file. You'll get much nicer syntax as well
(none of that \n stuff).
+ /* IBAT3,DBAT3 for first 16Mbytes */\n\
+ li 8, 0x01ff /* 16MB */\n\
+ li 9, 0x0002 /* rw */\n\
+ mtspr 0x216, 8 /* IBAT3U */\n\
+ mtspr 0x217, 9 /* IBAT3L */\n\
+ mtspr 0x21e, 8 /* DBAT3U */\n\
+ mtspr 0x21f, 9 /* DBAT3L */\n\
WIMG=0000, are you sure? Not M=1?
To be honest, I don't recall the details now.
But it was tested in the very early days, the result was not the
expected one and, in the end, manual cache coherency management was
still needed.
Sure, the memory controllers don't do coherency. I'm slightly worried
about two things:
1) Will the generic code use M=0 as well? Is it a problem if it
doesn't?
2) Do lwarx. etc. work in M=0?
And a question: does M=0 actually give better performance (lower bus
utilisation, and maybe saves a few cycles)?
Segher
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
