>>>>> "GL" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
>> instead? I'm using RedBoot on a virtex platform, and hence another
>> struct bd_info than the ML300/ML403.
GL> Alternate suggestion: Can we change virtex support to use the
GL> structure defined in ppcboot.h instead? (I've actually got that
GL> change in my tree and was planning on posting it for review today
GL> or tomorrow). bd_t is a stinking ugly mess, but things would be
GL> better if we standardize all virtex platforms on the stinking ugly
GL> mess shared by almost all the other ppc embedded board ports.
That's where the ugly mess pops up - RedBoot uses another
(incompatible) bd_t definition than U-boot, E.G:
typedef struct bd_info {
unsigned int bi_tag; /* Should be 0x42444944 "BDID" */
unsigned int bi_size; /* Size of this structure */
unsigned int bi_revision; /* revision of this structure */
unsigned int bi_bdate; /* bootstrap date, i.e. 0x11061997 */
unsigned int bi_memstart; /* Memory start address */
unsigned int bi_memsize; /* Memory (end) size in bytes */
unsigned int bi_intfreq; /* Internal Freq, in Hz */
unsigned int bi_busfreq; /* Bus Freq, in Hz */
unsigned int bi_cpmfreq; /* CPM Freq, in Hz */
unsigned int bi_brgfreq; /* BRG Freq, in Hz */
unsigned int bi_vco; /* VCO Out from PLL */
unsigned int bi_pci_freq; /* PCI Freq, in Hz */
unsigned int bi_baudrate; /* Default console baud rate */
unsigned int bi_immr; /* IMMR when called from boot rom */
unsigned char bi_enetaddr[6];
unsigned int bi_flashbase; /* Physical address of FLASH memory */
unsigned int bi_flashsize; /* Length of FLASH memory */
int bi_flashwidth; /* Width (8,16,32,64) */
unsigned char *bi_cmdline; /* Pointer to command line */
} bd_t;
I should probably migrate to U-boot anyway, but still ..
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
