On 4/29/07, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> "GL" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > >> instead? I'm using RedBoot on a virtex platform, and hence another > >> struct bd_info than the ML300/ML403. > > GL> Alternate suggestion: Can we change virtex support to use the > GL> structure defined in ppcboot.h instead? (I've actually got that > GL> change in my tree and was planning on posting it for review today > GL> or tomorrow). bd_t is a stinking ugly mess, but things would be > GL> better if we standardize all virtex platforms on the stinking ugly > GL> mess shared by almost all the other ppc embedded board ports. > > That's where the ugly mess pops up - RedBoot uses another > (incompatible) bd_t definition than U-boot, E.G:
Is the redboot bd_info structure already in the kernel tree? We could use a config option to select between the u-boot and redboot structures for all virtex platforms. That would keep the uglyness down to a minimum. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (403) 399-0195 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
