On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:58:05AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Pantelis, > > in message <3F124BF5.6070803 at intracom.gr> you wrote: > > > > >>IIRC the last time we such discussions simply nothing happened: see > > >>for example to code for dp_alloc / dp_free that was submitted several > > >>times. > > > > > >google knows nothing of this, can you give a pointer into the thread > > >please? Thanks. > > > > > > > > I was the one that sent the patches (search for dpalloc). > > I was referring to a much older implementation of this feature. I > sent it to Tom nearly two years ago: > > Subject: Re: Modifications to linuxppc_2_4_devel > From: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:57:30 +0200 > To: Tom Rini <trini at kernel.crashing.org> > > The patch in question was named "PATCH-006-dpfree+uart".
I really wish I had looked into making mutt keep a copy of sent mail a lot sooner. I don't suppose you have a copy of my reply to that as well? I suspect it was either "Can you break the uart stuff out from the dpfree stuff" and you didn't, or "This is large and intrusive and I'd feel better if I could make Dan Malek look at it". -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
