On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:26:13PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > in message <20030714143110.GA1211 at ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> you wrote: > > > > > I was referring to a much older implementation of this feature. I > > > sent it to Tom nearly two years ago: > ... > > I really wish I had looked into making mutt keep a copy of sent mail a > > lot sooner. I don't suppose you have a copy of my reply to that as > > well? I suspect it was either "Can you break the uart stuff out from > > the dpfree stuff" and you didn't, or "This is large and intrusive and > > I'd feel better if I could make Dan Malek look at it". > > I found two related replies in my archive: > > 28 Aug 2001: > ... > PATCH-006 - Looks good. I'll play w/ it a bit more tomorrow and let you > know. > ... > > 15 Oct 2001: > ... > PATCH-006 Paul Mundt has been a bit busy of late (and had his disks die > a week or so ago), but he should have something soon I hope. Sorry. > ...
I found that one (I do keep replies) and that was for an rpxfb patch. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
