On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:02:14PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Eugene, > > On Friday 16 September 2005 18:27, Eugene Surovegin wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:06:16PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > > > Add U-Boot support to AMCC PPC405 eval boards (bubinga, sycamore and > > > walnut) and cleanup PPC440 eval boards (bamboo, ebony, luan and ocotea) > > > to better support U-Boot as bootloader. > > > > In general, 44x pieces look OK, but 40x aren't. Notice, that we don't > > have any #ifdef CONFIG_UBOOT in 44x sources. Let's not add them for > > 40x, try to replicate the same boot-wrapper approach as Matt used for > > 44x. > > OK. I'll split the patch in two (44x and 40x stuff) so we can get the 44x > pieces on the way. > > Just to be sure: The 44x boot-wrapper approach you mention is > "boot/simple/pibs.c"?
Yes, there's both boot/simple/pibs.c and boot/simple/openbios.c that were created so we could have the default firmware and u-boot use the same kernel build. -Matt