On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 05:06:23PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Matt, > > On Monday 19 September 2005 15:59, Matt Porter wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:02:14PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > > > Just to be sure: The 44x boot-wrapper approach you mention is > > > "boot/simple/pibs.c"? > > > > Yes, there's both boot/simple/pibs.c and boot/simple/openbios.c that > > were created so we could have the default firmware and u-boot use the > > same kernel build. > > Yes, that's what I thought. But Eugene mentioned, that he boots vmlinux > without any boot-wrapper on the OpenBIOS targets (except Ebony probably).
Bad phrasing on my part. What I meant was "U-Boot is different from OpenBIOS targets already, as with U-Boot we don't use any boot-wrapper like with OpenBIOS". Sorry for confusion :). -- Eugene