Hi Matt, On Monday 19 September 2005 15:59, Matt Porter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:02:14PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Just to be sure: The 44x boot-wrapper approach you mention is > > "boot/simple/pibs.c"? > > Yes, there's both boot/simple/pibs.c and boot/simple/openbios.c that > were created so we could have the default firmware and u-boot use the > same kernel build.
Yes, that's what I thought. But Eugene mentioned, that he boots vmlinux without any boot-wrapper on the OpenBIOS targets (except Ebony probably). You would loose this possibility, if I add this wrapper and switch from OpenBIOS to U-Boot bd_info struct in the kernel. Did I miss something here? How should I proceed? Best regards, Stefan
