> -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: 'Scott Wood'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [UPDATED] tsec: Allow Ten Bit Interface to be > configurable > > > On Aug 14, 2007, at 16:01, Joe Hamman wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > >> > >> I still think it should just be a property of the ethernet node. We > >> aren't describing the TBI, we're describing a setting for the > >> ethernet controller's register. > >> > > > > Like this? Do we need to have one for each [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Scott and I have been talking, and right now it seems like a better > idea might be to have the TBI address get assigned dynamically, based > on where PHYs aren't. > > It's non-trivial to do (though not difficult), but this way we won't > have to regret creating a bad interface. You just need to look at > the mdio bus, and find out which addresses responded. Then you > create a variable in the gfar_private structure to hold what it gets > set to, and make sure that gfar_configure_serdes uses that value > instead of the TBIPA constant.
Sounds like a good plan. I'll try to put something together and post for comments. Thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
