On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:15:03PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > I think free(NULL) is required to be a no-op, so that test would be > unnecessary, but if there is another reason like coding style, I can > add it to the patch.
Ah, right. I tend to check everything out of paranoid habit, but I we can definitely rely on free() checking for null. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
