On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:30:31AM +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > The failures are part of the test and after the HW restoring I'm pretty > sure that the protocol waltzer is running fine. I noticed that the ptp4l > shows master offset and delay summaries. In order to have offset and delay > values, the Sync/DelayReq/DelayResp should be correctly exchanged, am I > right?
Right. > Another observation is that Killing and restarting again the ptp4l I reach > the SLAVE state without servo jump. Probably because the offset is below the threshold. > Just now I placed the servo_reset() inside handle_state_decision_event() > when we have a fresh new best master, after the clock_freq_est_reset() > method. Don't do that. That spoils your synchronization for nothing. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
