Il giorno dom 14 mar 2021 alle ore 16:58 Richard Cochran < richardcoch...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:30:31AM +0100, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: > > The failures are part of the test and after the HW restoring I'm pretty > > sure that the protocol waltzer is running fine. I noticed that the ptp4l > > shows master offset and delay summaries. In order to have offset and > delay > > values, the Sync/DelayReq/DelayResp should be correctly exchanged, am I > > right? > > Right. > > > > Another observation is that Killing and restarting again the ptp4l I > reach > > the SLAVE state without servo jump. > > Probably because the offset is below the threshold. > > I knew, I remarked this only to say that the clock was attached. > Just now I placed the servo_reset() inside handle_state_decision_event() > > when we have a fresh new best master, after the clock_freq_est_reset() > > method. > > Don't do that. That spoils your synchronization for nothing. > > I will better investigate. Thanks again luigi Thanks, > Richard > -- *Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini* My Professional Profile <http://www.linkedin.com/in/comio> *"UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." [cit.]*
_______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
