On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 11:31:04AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > Even if we ignore the technical aspect of the implementation, I think > it would not be very user friendly to have to set two different > options to get it working.
+1 As I mentioned in a response to your first post, we already have tons of configuration options, and some of them can and should be used to implement the new feature. NO MECHANISM can simply set inhibit_delay_request and initial_delay appropriately. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
