On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:56:13AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > As I mentioned in a response to your first post, we already have tons > of configuration options, and some of them can and should be used to > implement the new feature. > > NO MECHANISM can simply set inhibit_delay_request and initial_delay > appropriately.
As I understand it, that would not be exactly the same. It would still respond to delay_requests. I'm not sure how important that is. An inhibit_delay_resp option could be added to address that. initial_delay is currently not a port-specific option and it doesn't accept 0, which cannot be easily changed for compatibility reasons. -- Miroslav Lichvar _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-devel mailing list Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
