So first of all PTP doesn't compensate for anything at all is that right? 
(Is there a way todo this automatically?)
Found out that the delay i210 with another i210 is pretty consistent (very 
few nanoseconds).
It cancels only out if i have two completly identical card's?

That the intel driver speaks not a hundred percent proof is definitfly a 
thing.
Now i would need to proof which of them produces more in/egress latency. 



Von:    Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com>
An:     Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>
Kopie:  Armin HAMAR <armin.ha...@sprecher-automation.com>, 
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum:  03.07.2019 08:06
Betreff:        Re: [Linuxptp-users] PPS to Linux PTP offset/delay?



On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:31:44AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:36:50AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > So, with two
> > directly connected I210s (short cable) the measured delay should be
> > close to zero.
> 
> That is true of any two devices, since the tx/rx asymmetry cancels out
> (even without any corrections applied).

The error in the measured offset cancels out between any two identical
NICs, but the measured PTP delay is a sum of the TX and RX
timestamping errors (and the delay in the cable).

For example between two I350s on 1Gb I see a delay of 507 ns. An
offset I measured between an I210 (using the igb compensation) and
I350 in the same computer over PCIe is about 240 ns, so the TX/RX
error of the I350 seems to be very asymmetric too.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar


_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users

Reply via email to