> Hi. I know of these wishes, and it's not impossible that I will
> implement them... The thing I'm (very slowly) working on at the moment
> is an optimization of the sample lookup in the sfz engine. I think I'm
> going to try to finish that first.
>
> I think the group/off_by feature is already implemented though?
>    
Hurryyyy ;P naah, I understand this is a spare time project :) I read 
somewhere there is a bug so you need to use "offby" instead of "off_by", 
I have not done any further testing on this claim tho.. I also forgot to 
mention it would be nice to get sfz out of CVS so more people could 
actually use it without necessarily having to compile the thing themselves..
> Sure. Some time ago I started at the wrong end, and made some
> measurements of the filter of SFZ Player. When I failed to figure out
> how the cutoff frequency correlated to the input parameters I gave up
> for the moment. But of course it is not necessary, or even desirable, to
> have the filter to behave exactly like SFZ Player.
>
> /Andreas
>    

naah, as long as it's sensible... Anyway thanks for the work you put 
into this project so far.. I wish I could donate but atm I simply don't 
have any spare cash..

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel

Reply via email to