On 08/10/2010 03:54 PM, andreas.pers...@bredband2.com wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:18:21 +0300, alexander<axeldenst...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> Hi. I know of these wishes, and it's not impossible that I will >>> implement them... The thing I'm (very slowly) working on at the moment >>> is an optimization of the sample lookup in the sfz engine. I think I'm >>> going to try to finish that first. >>> >>> I think the group/off_by feature is already implemented though? >>> >> Hurryyyy ;P naah, I understand this is a spare time project :) I read >> somewhere there is a bug so you need to use "offby" instead of "off_by", >> I have not done any further testing on this claim tho.. > Hi! You were right - off_by wasn't supported (regardless of spelling). I > had only been testing with regions where group and off_by had the same > value, that's why I thought it worked. Anyway, I have now made and > committed a fix for this, so group, off_by/offby and off_mode/offmode > should hopefully work as expected. > > I have also started to implement CC-triggered regions (on_locc/on_hicc), > but it's not quite ready for commit yet. > > /Andreas > Aah nice, the off_by opcode is only for the pedal action stuff so it's actually not 'needed' before CC triggering is in there.. for my piano at least ;P I just released a new version of it if you happen to be on the linux-audio-users list.. I will post it in the LS forum tomorrow..
Does the sfz implementation in LS stream ogg vorbis yet? it at least doesn't seem to do so.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
