Note that jsampler.log contains messages only from the last session,
so your last session should be using the fantasia front-end.

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Grigor Iliev <gr.il...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there some error logged in ~/.jsampler/jsampler.log?
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Andrew C <countfuzzb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm launching Fantasia from a terminal using:
>>  /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-1.6.0.21/bin/java -jar Fantasia-0.9.jar
>>
>> /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-run-1.6.0.21/bin/java -version reports
>>
>> java version "1.6.0_21"
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_21-b06)
>> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 17.0-b16, mixed mode, sharing)
>>
>> Admittedly, the compiler version is still the same, the Eclipse Java
>> Compiler, but I don't know if this has an effect on the compiled
>> binary yet.
>>
>> Oddly enough, JS_Classic seems to be drawn fine, but a blank box
>> appears where the 'proccessing' box would appear when updating the
>> instruments database.
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Grigor Iliev <gr.il...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How are you launching fantasia? If you are doing it from the terminal
>>> with command like "java -jar Fantasia.jar", try "java -version" to see
>>> what version you are using. You may need to use full path, for example
>>> "/opt/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -jar Fantasia.jar".
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Andrew C <countfuzzb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey again.
>>>>
>>>> I managed to get jsampler successfully compiled (had to fiddle around
>>>> with setting my JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to the JDK,
>>>> instead of the JRE of a previous install.)
>>>>
>>>> But this odd incomplete, undrawn fantasia window still remains. Any
>>>> idea on what I can do to troubleshoot this problem? It seems very
>>>> strange to just suddenly come across this problem now.
>>>>
>>>> http://imagebin.org/116863
>>>> Is what I see. No error messages appear when running it from the CLI.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Andrew.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Andrew C <countfuzzb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Ah yes, thanks for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> javac -version reports:
>>>>> Eclipse Java Compiler 0.972_R35x, 3.5.1 release, Copyright IBM Corp
>>>>> 2000, 2009. All rights reserved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which makes a lot more sense. Now how would I go about changing this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Andreas Persson
>>>>> <andreas.pers...@bredband2.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Andrew C skrev 2010-10-02 12:46:
>>>>>>> Hm yes, I just remembered I had to install the following packages so
>>>>>>> the javac compiler could find eclipse-ecj.jar after upgrading my
>>>>>>> system from about a month ago:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ecj-gcj
>>>>>>> ecj
>>>>>>> libecj-java-gcj
>>>>>>> libecj-java
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AFAIK, this is just a bunch of stuff to do with the Eclipse IDE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ecj is an alternative from the Eclipse project for the javac compiler in
>>>>>> Sun JDK. Maybe you're running that? Check with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> javac -version
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it's correct (that is, Sun) maybe your ant installation chooses the
>>>>>> ecj compiler for some reason. There's an ant option, build.compiler,
>>>>>> that should let you choose compiler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>>>>>> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>>>>>> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
>>>> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
>>>> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
>>>> two and get a better understanding.
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
>>>> Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel

Reply via email to