On Samstag, 28. September 2019 20:13:16 CEST Ivan Maguidhir wrote:
> > As for LFO1: it seems you were right, according to your audio demo file it
> > seems as if LFO1 starts with a mid value (instead of a max value that we
> > currently have in our implementation).
>
> Yes, from listening I wasn't actually sure. I had to look at it in
> Audacity.
>
> > As for LFO2: It's a bit harder to tell, probably it also starts with a mid
> > value, it is not as clear to see/hear as with LFO 1.
>
> Yes. It's very hard to tell. One iteration of the LFO from 0 to max to 0
> again takes about 2 seconds. From the start of the recording to the
> first 0 is 1.5 seconds so I think that means it starts with the mid value.
>
> > As for LFO3: That result is actually a bit surprising. From your file it
> > rather sounds as if LFO3 would start at max value, and not at mid (neutral
> > pitch). Was there maybe some kind of mistake?
>
> Yes, from looking at it in Audacity I think it starts with max value. I
> don't think there was a mistake. I've attached an image of the LFO
> settings I used for you to check. Thanks again.
Ok then I guess I'll change that in our gig engine to:
* LFO1 (volume): mid start level
* LFO2 (cutoff): mid start level
* LFO3 (pitch): max start level
unless somebody has objections.
CU
Christian
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
