On Dienstag, 16. März 2021 22:41:50 CET Doug Gray wrote: > > On 16 Mar 2021, at 5:15 am, Christian Schoenebeck > > <schoeneb...@linuxsampler.org> wrote: > > > > any older version > > of the SDK will do, which you can find on Steinberg's Github page for > > instance, both via git (tags), as well as convenient zip/tarball file > > Sadly these zip and tar ball files are empty except for the very top level. > Doug
I probably have to ask somebody at Steinberg what's the deal for this disguise regarding the VST 2 SDK now. I wonder whether there is some legal reason or whether they just want to force developers moving to VST3 now. There are some other sources, for instance I see some fairly old VST 2.4 SDK zip files from 2006 on the infamous internet archive website, the should work, but OTOH I think I don't have such old version copies of the official VST SDKs here anymore. Otherwise I would have told you just their (e.g. MD5, SHA256) checksums so that you could verify by yourself that they are actually identical with Steinberg's official releases back then. Maybe somebody else on the list still has such an old VST 2.4 SDK and might share the checksums for verification. CU Christian _______________________________________________ Linuxsampler-devel mailing list Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
