No 64bit, no raid, no fancy gui......

If you bought a typewriter off craigslist you could take the money you save
and pay someone to translate youtube videos into ascii art and make a flip
book

I'm just jokin around

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Dante Lanznaster <[email protected]> wrote:

> Interesting view of the market.
> Are you going to the meeting Saturday?
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Michael Sokolov <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello again,
>>
>> Thanks for all the recommendations.
>>
>> It was reassuring to hear that older hardware will work fine, but I need
>> to clarify something: due to my general dislike of the pee sea (PC)
>> architecture, I have absolutely no, zero, zip, nada PC hardware already
>> on hand, all our existing hardware is VAX, Sun SPARC or mainframe gear,
>> nothing even remotely PC-compatible.  Therefore, whether I go with new
>> or used, either way I have to buy that PC or the complete set of parts
>> for it somewhere.  (The only exception is that we do already have a
>> good Viewsonic monitor with PeeCee video input and PS/2 kbd & mouse
>> which we intend to use for this workstation.)
>>
>> Which brings me to the following: if anyone on this list has any old PC
>> hardware which meets the specs that have been discussed and which they
>> would be willing to sell to us for a price less than what we would have
>> to pay at a store for a new low-end system, let's talk.
>>
>> Chris Penn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > A different strategy could be to build a box for speed.  The functions
>> > you mention are pretty basic and can be done on a windows machine, so
>> > I say make a box that can do them waaaaay faster.
>> > [...]
>> > Maybe a decent video card for compiz if
>> > she wishes she had a Mac.
>>
>> Comparison with Weenzone/Mac is completely irrelevant in this case
>> because the intended user of the workstation in question is my
>> girlfriend who has already been required to give all that stuff up as a
>> condition for our relationship.
>>
>> I have a policy that anyone who receives financial and/or emotional
>> support from me (spouse, child, whoever) is required to use only those
>> computing technologies which I approve on ethical grounds.  Weendoze and
>> MacOS are on the black list of prohibited stuff and so are GNOME, KDE
>> and most definitely compiz or whatever the hell that is.  If the
>> spouse/child/whoever wishes to use Weendoze, MacOS, GNOME, KDE or compiz
>> or whatever, they are more than welcome to do so, but in that case they
>> must find some other place to live and some other means of support.
>>
>> > and a gigbit NIC.
>>
>> Completely useless given that our office network is strictly 10 Mbps
>> (true coaxial Ethernet in the data centre, 10BaseT going out to the
>> cubicles).  The outside Internet connection is SDSL @ 384 kbps serving
>> as an ARPANET replacement.
>>
>> > You gonna go 64bit?
>>
>> I would really prefer not to, just to make my sysadmin job easier.  I
>> hate admining modern Linux on pee seas as it is, I don't need the extra
>> complication of however-in-hell does that Intel 64-bit stuff work...
>>
>> > [recommendations regarding software RAID]
>>
>> Completely unnecessary because the PC in question will never have
>> anything of any value stored on it.  If the HDD goes up in smoke, we
>> throw it out, stick a new one in there and reinstall Slackware.  All
>> valuable information is stored only on the mainframe.
>>
>> > [OpenOffice stuff]
>>
>> We won't be using OO either, the company policy requires that all TPS
>> reports be written in vi on the UNIX mainframe.
>>
>> As I've said, we need to put this PeeCee together to do web (Firefox),
>> MP3s and video, stuff which absolutely positively cannot be done on the
>> mainframe.  Anything that can be done on the mainframe, regardless of
>> how un-modern and user-unfriendly it is, is done on the mainframe.
>>
>> MS
>> _______________________________________________
>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
>


-- 
Peter Manis
(678) 269-7979

Reply via email to