Im ment nfs.....not ntfs On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Chris Penn <[email protected]> wrote: > ssh or ntfs in a nonM$ environment. > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Jeff Lasman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 08:37 am, Chris Louden wrote: >> >>> Why use windows protocol to connect from one Linux box >>> to another. SMB is there so that Windows computer can connect to it. >> >> I'd love to agree with you. And that's certainly been the case in the >> past. And most of us would argue that it should continue to be the >> case. >> >> But in local area networks I see samba as the most convenient way to >> connect systems even in a totally non-MS environments. If there are >> better solutions that are just as seamless, please educate me :). >> >> Thanks! >> >> Jeff >> -- >> Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services >> P.O. Box 52200, Riverside, CA 92517 >> Our jplists address used on lists is for list email only >> voice: +1 951 643-5345, or see: >> "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"; >> _______________________________________________ >> LinuxUsers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers >> > > > > -- > "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to > be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." > -Roger Penrose >
-- "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity." -Roger Penrose
