On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Michael Sokolov <msoko...@ivan.harhan.org>wrote:
> > And not a very good one at that, given your inability to run that Nokia > D50 upgrader successfully. The other person who had offered to do it > (and who will be getting a well-deserved check from me at this Wednesday's > meeting) has succeeded on the very first try, the same evening when I > gave him the pointer to the software file and the IP address of the DSLAM. > > Sorry, couldn't resist. > > MS > > P.S. The following excerpt from my tcpdump log is a hint as to why > Dante's attempts to push code to my D50 had failed miserably: > > TYPE I > 200 Type set to I, binary mode > PORT 192,168,254,251,202,6 > 200 Port set okay > STOR utsSys.o > > I did mention that I don't believe in NAT, didn't I? > > Just so the other people are aware of the factors, that D50 upgrade has as much to do with Windows as MalwareBytes has to do with Linux. Sorry I couldn't help you, but having to install that NT4 VM ended up being out of question given my current assignments. Yes, I am behind a NAT, and yes, *everything* else works just fine. I can host stuff on my computer and I can send out data that complies with a well-defined *standard*, if you know what I mean. ;) -- Dante P.S.: I'm glad the other person got a check for this.
_______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers