On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Michael Sokolov
<msoko...@ivan.harhan.org>wrote:

>
> And not a very good one at that, given your inability to run that Nokia
> D50 upgrader successfully.  The other person who had offered to do it
> (and who will be getting a well-deserved check from me at this Wednesday's
> meeting) has succeeded on the very first try, the same evening when I
> gave him the pointer to the software file and the IP address of the DSLAM.
>
> Sorry, couldn't resist.
>
> MS
>
> P.S. The following excerpt from my tcpdump log is a hint as to why
> Dante's attempts to push code to my D50 had failed miserably:
>
> TYPE I
> 200 Type set to I, binary mode
> PORT 192,168,254,251,202,6
> 200 Port set okay
> STOR utsSys.o
>
> I did mention that I don't believe in NAT, didn't I?
>
>
Just so the other people are aware of the factors, that D50 upgrade
has as much to do with Windows as MalwareBytes has to do with
Linux. Sorry I couldn't help you, but having to install that NT4 VM
ended up being out of question given my current assignments.

Yes, I am behind a NAT, and yes, *everything* else works just fine.
I can host stuff on my computer and I can send out data that
complies with a well-defined *standard*, if you know what I mean. ;)

--
Dante

P.S.: I'm glad the other person got a check for this.
_______________________________________________
LinuxUsers mailing list
LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers

Reply via email to