Dante Lanznaster <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry I couldn't help you, but having to install that NT4 VM > ended up being out of question given my current assignments.
I don't think it needed NT4 specifically (Topher, which Windows version did you use?), but it clearly needed a NAT-free connection to the target. The proprietary closed source Weendoze software in question implements its own ad hoc FTP client to do its dirty deed, and this ad hoc FTP client uses PORT, not PASV. It just hasn't been designed with NAT in mind, and design blemishes which can't be fixed are what closed source proprietary software is all about. > Yes, I am behind a NAT, and yes, *everything* else works just fine. > I can host stuff on my computer and I can send out data that > complies with a well-defined *standard*, if you know what I mean. ;) But I thought the whole point of Weendoze consulting was to help users who are stuck with shitty proprietary closed source software which can't be fixed to comply with standards? Weendoze people are paid to work around limitations which can't be fixed properly, aren't they? MS _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
