Well, look at the bright side..., at least you didn't get shot for not doin it Dante ! :>D
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Dante Lanznaster <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Michael Sokolov <msoko...@ivan.harhan.org> > wrote: >> >> And not a very good one at that, given your inability to run that Nokia >> D50 upgrader successfully. The other person who had offered to do it >> (and who will be getting a well-deserved check from me at this Wednesday's >> meeting) has succeeded on the very first try, the same evening when I >> gave him the pointer to the software file and the IP address of the DSLAM. >> >> Sorry, couldn't resist. >> >> MS >> >> P.S. The following excerpt from my tcpdump log is a hint as to why >> Dante's attempts to push code to my D50 had failed miserably: >> >> TYPE I >> 200 Type set to I, binary mode >> PORT 192,168,254,251,202,6 >> 200 Port set okay >> STOR utsSys.o >> >> I did mention that I don't believe in NAT, didn't I? >> > > Just so the other people are aware of the factors, that D50 upgrade > has as much to do with Windows as MalwareBytes has to do with > Linux. Sorry I couldn't help you, but having to install that NT4 VM > ended up being out of question given my current assignments. > > Yes, I am behind a NAT, and yes, *everything* else works just fine. > I can host stuff on my computer and I can send out data that > complies with a well-defined *standard*, if you know what I mean. ;) > > -- > Dante > > P.S.: I'm glad the other person got a check for this. > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxUsers mailing list > LinuxUsers@socallinux.org > http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers > > _______________________________________________ LinuxUsers mailing list LinuxUsers@socallinux.org http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
