Umm... there is a opt-out button.
Just for that sort of thing. Its a bit hidden, but its there. Just
look for 'edit'.
- Trevor

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trevor,
>
> I am happy that Google has decided to simplify their privacy policy
> resulting in less words.  It is also great that Google wants to make
> searching more predictable for each user based on prior internet
> activity. I can even appreciate that this sharing of personal
> information happens within Google controlled websites...etc.
>
> What I do not like is that I cannot say no to this sharing of my
> information.  I do not want Google to use what I do on the net to
> predict what shows up in my search results;  if I want better results
> I will refine my search.  I do not need Google to compare how often I
> look at "jaguar" the cat vs "Jaguar" the car and assume the more
> commonly searched is what should show up in my browser.  If people
> want this feature, Google should feel free to turn this sharing of
> personal information on by default, as long as they let me turn it off
> at will.  Ghostery is great, I have been using it for a while now, but
> I should not need it to protect myself from Google.  Google should not
> be able to hold my Gmail/G+ hostage (on certain machines) until I
> click 'ok' on this required policy.  I have received seven emails from
> Google telling me about this policy, all of which say:
>
> "We're getting rid of over 60 different privacy policies across Google
> and replacing them with one that's a lot shorter and easier to read.
> Our new policy covers multiple products and features, reflecting our
> desire to create one beautifully simple and intuitive experience
> across Google.
>
> We believe this stuff matters, so please take a few minutes to read
> our updated Privacy Policy and Terms of Service at
> http://www.google.com/policies. These changes will take effect on
> March 1, 2012."
>
>
> Yeeeeah.......no.  The fact that the new policy is mandatory seems suspect, 
> IMO.
>
>
> Chris...
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Trevor Benedict <mre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ohh, and here is a cool one. And if you use Ghostery, you block most
>> of them from loading, for me it was 51.
>> http://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp
>> - Trevor
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Trevor Benedict <mre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Chris,
>>> There is a lot of miss information, and lack of information out there.
>>> Its best if you go and read what is changing.
>>> http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/preview/
>>> http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacy/ads/
>>> http://www.google.com/policies/
>>> http://www.google.com/policies/faq/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Chris Penn <cantorm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I have a serious problem with it.  On some of my machines I cannot
>>>> access my email unless I accept the terms; I have yet to do so.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder does the new privacy policy apply to domains you own,
>>>> m...@mydomain.org, if you host it through google?
>>>>
>>>> Chris...
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Hugo Arriola <hharri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I don't feel confortable anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2012 6:16 PM, "Jeff" <jpli...@nobaloney.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How do we feel about Google, Gmail, and privacy issues, now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.webmasterworld.com/goog/4410455.htm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> May run slow today, tomorrow, because site is linked through from 
>>>>>> google's
>>>>>> main page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Post Office Box 52200, Riverside, CA 92517
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our jplists address used on lists is for list email only
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Phone +1 909 266-9209, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html";
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>>>>>> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
>>>>>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>>>>> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
>>>>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to
>>>> be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity."
>>>>  -Roger Penrose
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>>>> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
>>>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>> _______________________________________________
>> LinuxUsers mailing list
>> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
>> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
>
>
>
> --
> "As we open our newspapers or watch our television screens, we seem to
> be continually assaulted by the fruits of Mankind's stupidity."
>  -Roger Penrose
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxUsers mailing list
> LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
> http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers
_______________________________________________
LinuxUsers mailing list
LinuxUsers@socallinux.org
http://socallinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linuxusers

Reply via email to