[lug:14803] Re: Is there a non-unicode Linux version?

Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:58:06 -0700 


On Jul 23, 9:33 am, Adragontattoo <[email protected]> wrote:
> with the relatively low cost of computers and especially HDDs and RAM
> now, Unicode would be the least of my concerns

Nevertheless, it still should be a concern. Software is getting slower
at a much more rapid pace than hardware is getting faster. Any gains
have been negated. I've heard from reliable sources that vista is much
slower than xp, despite being newer and often running on newer
hardware.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit our group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


























					Reply via email to