On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:04:37PM -0800, Ping wrote: >> I agree with you guys for this plan since special settings of >> identical devices would (probably) have to be dealt separately in >> xorg.conf, which would have a different dev_name for each tool anyway. > > Ack. That's pretty much how I was imagining it. > Did we decide on whether backward compatibility here is needed?
If we don't have a forward solution (as you described before) for identical devices, we would have to provide a backward solution for linuxwacom.rules in the old xorg.conf way. I rely on both you and Peter for solutions (there is nowhere to escape once you come here :). > What about 'list' vs '--list'? I like the idea of `xinput list` > and `xsetwacom list` doing exactly the same thing, and not having > to remember which of them needs -- for that option... I like "list". It saves two key presses (energy efficient :). The old xsetwacom uses "list" instead of "--list". Ping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
