On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Chris Bagwell <ch...@cnpbagwell.com> wrote: > Ping, do you think the cleanup patch is acceptable then?
This was the question that I asked myself when I replied yesterday. And I could not make the decision then. > To summarize the patch: it was removing broken logic that looked at > xorg.conf values for maxX/Y/Z because user values were always thrown > away. Yes, I understand the point. As you described in your commit comments, the tablet-to-screen mapping use case can be covered by BottomX/Y options. > Based on responses so far and further reviews I've been doing, I think > we can safely say there is no current need for user to be able to > set/override those Max values reported by hardware... so no need to > get the broken logic working. So, reviewed-by: Ping Cheng <pingli...@gmail.com>. Ping ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Linuxwacom-devel mailing list Linuxwacom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxwacom-devel
