On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know what you mean, but if your definition of a 'destination > network' is either a single or multi-homed site, then the FIB would hold 50K > entries.
I am not responding to all of the points raised in your message, because you are still missing the fundamental problem that negative replies from the LISP Mapping Service, which should be cached in the ITR, can cause the table to be inflated to a size that is, literally, ten times the number of possible positive mapping entries. Once again, read my original LISP mailing list post on this subject. If you read the part in the MS draft that dictates negative replies must not overlap any possible positive mappings, and consider how RIRs are currently allocating IPv6 address space to networks, you should easily realize how this part of the MS protocol needs additional flexibility. Quite simply, a 50k entry IPv6 table would indeed consume 500k entries when negative entries are included. The simple arithmetic is in my original post, months ago. -- Jeff S Wheeler <[email protected]> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
