Hi Luigi,
So this goes in the direction of Jeff saying that the churn
problem should not be neglected.
Very much indeed.
And to save one more email from Luigi .. I do not buy the argument
that this is simply "out of scope" as this would really mean "out
of practical reality".
Too late.. ;-)
;-)
May be I was unclear. What I wanted to say is that this was out of
scope of the papers that were cited in the thread.
Ahh ok - it was not clear. Of course it makes sense to divide the work
into chunks.
I truly think that security issues need to be explored, understood,
> solved.
But for me this is not really a security issue, but scaling issue of
possible production legitimate use rather then any form of attack.
Cheers,
r.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
