Robert, On 18 Jul 2011, at 15:20, Robert Raszuk wrote: > Hi Luigi, > >>>> So this goes in the direction of Jeff saying that the churn >>>> problem should not be neglected. >>> >>> Very much indeed. >>> >>> And to save one more email from Luigi .. I do not buy the argument >>> that this is simply "out of scope" as this would really mean "out >>> of practical reality". >> >> Too late.. ;-) > > ;-) > >> May be I was unclear. What I wanted to say is that this was out of >> scope of the papers that were cited in the thread. > > Ahh ok - it was not clear. Of course it makes sense to divide the work into > chunks. > >> I truly think that security issues need to be explored, understood, > > solved. > > But for me this is not really a security issue, but scaling issue of possible > production legitimate use rather then any form of attack. >
definitely, this was our very first answer to Jeff when he raised us the problem. Jeff said "DoS", we said "cache management". And your example is perfect to show this where legitimate traffic has the same effect than an attack. Thx, Damien Saucez > Cheers, > r. > > > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
