> It is correct. If the xTR does not have the necessary state to > forward a packet, it must communicate with the MS infrastructure. As > cache hit rate goes down, direct MS involvement in forwarding > operations goes up. The MS does not see the packet itself, but it > must perform work for each miss.
Darrel has already mentioned that the ITR can "forward-on-cache-miss" by default if the implementation wants to protect its cache. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
