Terry, > I view that there is consensus in the workgroup to adopt this draft as a > work group item. > > Can the authors please submit a revision in the appropriate fashion. > > I'd also like to remind the authors that as a WG document I am expecting > that any substantive document changes are the result of WG discussion. > > I would also like to call the WG's attention to the comments regarding code > points for transport of other protocols and ask the WG to consider those > comments in the process of developing this draft.
I note that you have called consensus to adopt draft-farinacci- lisp-lcaf as a LISP working group document. This document describes its use for L2VPN. Could you please explain where this is covered in the current LISP working group charter. Yakov. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
