Workgroup and others, Donning the brightly coloured LISP Chair hat.
The document draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt was handed back to the Workgroup and the document editors following the IETF last call. The LC prompted interesting feedback and highlighted some issues. The Responsible AD and the LISP chairs have discussed the future of this document. We believe that the future of this document could be best served by splitting it in two (one that allocates/justifies the prefix, and one that describes the LISP specific allocation mechanism) and also altering text to address the concerns raised during the IETF LC. However, before the WG starts to rework the document, I would first like to canvass the LISP WG as to your opinions. 1) Should we, as a WG, continue to work on this item? Is it necessary/useful for LISP? 2) If so, what direction should the WG take this document so that the LISP experiment is best served? I'd also like to call on those folks (as Brian did) who offered review of this document (CC'd here) during the IETF last call to participate on the LISP mailing list as to its future. Cheers Terry
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
