On 08/01/2013 10:29, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> On 8 Jan. 2013, at 09:23 , Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> - description on how to use this prefix
>
> Can be improved… I agree.
>
>> - short-term routing strategy / impact on routing table
>> - long-term routing strategy / impact on routing table
>
> I think that "routing strategy" is something falling in the "how to use the
> prefix".
Maybe, but it is a major sub-section. This is the area that got me worried
enough to comment on the draft - especially, why non-participants in the
LISP experiment would propagate the prefix. At least, before arguments such
as "This is the only way to reach Facebook" can be used.
> Impact on the routing table … depends on "how to use the prefix" ;-)
>
>> - migration path between them
>>
>
> Good point.
Essential point, I'd say: how does this prefix behave around the tipping
point between "a few sites use LISP" and "most sites use LISP"?
Brian
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
