Commenting just on this one piece, the reason for suggesting separating
the two pieces has two components, as I understand the situation.
1) There is a belief that it would be helpful to get the prefix soon.
2) working out, ad then clearly documen, the plan for LISP EID
assignment / delegation still needs significant work, and is not likely
to complete quickly.
If these two observations are both accurate, then separating the
problems seems the only path that meets the goals. If we do not need to
get the prefix allocated quickly, then I would tend to strongly favor
working out the rest of the system, delegation, allocation, and usage so
that we know how all the parts work.
Yours,
Joel
On 1/8/2013 5:22 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
The Responsible AD and the LISP chairs have discussed the future of this
>document. We believe that the future of this document could be best served
>by splitting it in two (one that allocates/justifies the prefix, and one
>that describes the LISP specific allocation mechanism) and also altering
>text to address the concerns raised during the IETF LC.
May I dare to ask why?
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
