> Presuming the EID block were issued, would the "EIDs are in f00/12" knob > be a site-local setting or would it be the default for EID architecture?
Per ITR yes. > One of interesting aspects of EID space is its overlap with IPv6 space, > and hence I was wondering if the long-term plans are for formally disjoint So here is my definition of the separate spaces, which I think is technically correct: If a prefix is advertised by a site into BGP (versus injected into BGP by a PITR), the prefix is a RLOC prefix. Else, if the prefix is registered to the mapping database system, then the prefix is an EID-prefix. Else, the prefix is either unallocated or allocated and not used. This is for a IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes. For MAC addresses or any multi-Tue extended EID, there are other rules. > spaces? (Absent that, issuance of EID prefixes implies issuance of IPv6 > space, which has some policy implications for the existing address > registry system, and is probably why several folks on the list keep > noting the need to liaison with the ISP community via the RIRs...) So an RIR allocated prefix can follow the above rules. And an IANA allocated prefix can follow the above rules. And within a closed network, a private address can follow the above rules. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
